In the midst of an ongoing colorism debate in the country, Mr. Lapisla Zuli, who has been accused of being a colorist, finds himself participating in an interview to clarify his stance on the matter. However, instead of addressing the issue head-on and engaging in a meaningful dialogue, he opts to evade the discussion and persist as a colorist, refusing to acknowledge the harm caused by such discriminatory beliefs. This choice not only perpetuates the problematic ideology but also demonstrates a reluctance to challenge ingrained biases and contribute to the progress towards a more inclusive and equitable society.